Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Alaska Ag.....Is that Alaska Grown?

We've all likely seen the label -

But what, exactly, does it mean?

Fierce defenders, those producers who bust butt to grow or raise food here in state, believe it means wholly grown or raised here, period. Basically from birth to butcher, germination to harvest, no wiggle room allowed. 

Other folks?  Well, not so much. Even Dear Director (of the DOA) has waffled on what qualifies as Alaska Grown. 

When it comes to branding and marketing, AlaskaGrown has a certain panache, a certain expectation that surrounds the concept and the bright yellow, blue and green logo. Proudly worn by those born here, and sported by fans and tourists who visit, it is an unmistakable symbol of Alaska agriculture.

That marketing gets marginalized and blurred, when this happens:

 (We'll take four dozen of the Alaska hardy pineapple plants, please!)

Or the signage in your local grocery store does not reflect what's actually on the shelf, or the produce cannot be found at all, or you're wondering at the very large images of your competitor, proudly beaming down from on high...and fuming about how they were chosen, and you (and your farm) were not.

Or worse...the packaging can be misleading, as well as the terms used to describe the package contents.  In theory, to qualify for AlaskaGrown, an animal must spend at least 51% of its life here in Alaska.  This applies to vegetables imported as seedlings as well.

A large number of food producers (of all types) don't bother with the AlaskaGrown designation. It is a relatively inexpensive branding to acquire, but the programs' history is sketchy and memories are long in Alaska agriculture. Others prefer to create their own brands and labels for marketing, not replying on the common denominator concept for local advertising and promotions. Alaskan producers are just as independent as any other group here, and some want to build their own identity, without the checkered auspices that the logo represents.

Yet an incident whereby the Director of the DOA, acquiesced that imported vegetables could be sold as AlaskaGrown, if it spent any time at all in Alaska dirt....leaves residents and consumers alike wondering just how AlaskaGrown their purchases truly are. As usual, the DOA spreads more confusion and distrust with the following:

Not one to miss an opportunity to re-plow harrowed ground, the DOA has jumped on a related platform they're calling a "Livestock Certification/Quality Assurance Program"   There are already national programs, so it can safely be presumed that the DOA has sniffed out grant money/federal funds to reinvent the wheel for Alaskan farmers and ranchers. Since more programs=more money=more staff=more important DOA, you can be sure that this will be created and launched regardless of need or impact. Are Alaskan cattle and hog producers going to jump happily into this new program that the DOA will provide for their assistance?  Perhaps a few, but most are too busy building their businesses, fighting bureaucracy, and struggling to cover expenses, to pay attention to whatever it is they're blathering about in Palmer.

When it comes to "truth in advertising", Alaska is a wide open field of possibilities. The AlaskaGrown program, for all its purported benefits, is not necessary for marketing.  Those that would deliberately mislead the consumer, are easily caught out for their actions, thanks in no small part to the tiny population and the rise in social media.  That there is no standard for cattle and hogs processed here should come as no surprise to anyone.  Thankfully, Alaska remains small enough that if you have questions, you can always just call the farm or ranch yourself, and ask.







17 comments:

Charle said...

Eloquent and succinct. Thanks for verbalizing the angst of Alaska's producers. Wish we had a director that gave a flip and actually worked for US. Perhaps, like everything else Alaskans do, we should start our own DoA and make the gov'ts DOA, DOA.

suvalley said...

There hasn't been a need for the DOA for decades. Everything they do could easily be either eliminated and/or moved to other departments. For example...the DOA's budget includes a line item for the ARLF that the BAC manages. Half a million bucks. Every single year.


But as to AlaskaGrown, and livestock producers, I have to agree with the poster on the previous blog who was confused. I recently saw a screenshot, whereby a local cattle producer avowed that his stock was "the only grain fed" in the state...and, marvel of marvels, grass fed as well. Not only that, that beef was available in January.

After I stopped snickering, I realized just who was getting snookered.

Caveat Emptor, indeed!

Anonymous said...

You should have the picture of the Butcher Block #9 well marbled Grass fed free ranged beef that they get from Canada on there and run on Delta Junction pasture in January and February to make them free range. Oh and don't forget to call them steers when there really heifers and cows! Mikes Meats is doing the same thing now with there beef and pork! "Alaska Grown" for Sure! What a CROCK OF SHIT! BE REAL DOA DO YOUR FUCKING JOB REGULATE THIS!

Anonymous said...

So, specifically what do you see as a solution on misuse of AK. Grown label? If you were Director how would you work to curb the mis use and false marketing of meat producers useing the AK. Grown label?
Maybe a constructive dialogue about this issue instead of a bunch of whiners being haters on this blog, may actually be helpful to keeping this logo legitimate, instead of just using this blog as a bully platform.

Anonymous said...

LOL! THIS BLOG is the "bully platform"? Oh, seriously, me thinks thou dost deflect too much. Clearly the Div of Ag has had the corner on the "bully platform" market for far too long. Or perhaps you haven't been paying attention. Us "whiners and haters" have plenty of reason to complain about the ineptitude, corruption, cronyism and illegalities occurring at the Div of Ag. Nice try though.

Anonymous said...

So no constructive solutions brought to this blog on a specific ask?! I guess you will change the state of what you feel is wrong by having plenty to complaine about with a few other like minded complainers. Sounds like an unintelligent solution for an unsuccessful outcome..... what a waste.

Anonymous said...

You obviously are a complete dip shit! If you not a BUDDY to Arthur Keys or a local favorite like Nate Burris or Greg Gillanis or Scott Mugrage or sit on a Farm Bureau board with Arthur Keys or his Father-in-law Ben Vanderweel or owe ARLF money and keep owing them money then you get to use the "Alaska Grown" logo unrestricted! But if you come to Alaska and DO things without there blessing or inputs or money then you catch 9 kinds of Hell from them from using there beloved logo the State mind you actually owns, any other place in the USA the State owns nothing like this and controls nothing mind you! So person of VAST knowledge of how to accomplish things here in this reasonable minded State of Alaska what is YOUR proposal to regulate the ever growing miss use and miss leading and complete idiotic advertising of the "Alaska Grown".

suvalley said...

!. The very idea that the DOA could regulate anything, should scare the pants off every producer in the state. Thankfully, they have no police powers to enforce anything.
2. The remedy to all this false and misleading advertising lies with the state, perhaps the attorney general's offices, perhaps another related to consumer issues.
3. The DOA is incapable of fairly administering any sort of "compliance board" to make sure the AlaskaGrown label is used correctly. Do you really want them reviewing your advertising?
4. Since the DOA is shielded from FOIA's, (by trotting out a new refusal based on "trade secrets") not one resident will be able to learn anything about anything.
5. This blog is an outlet for everyone who has suffered by the mistreatment of the CBC of Ag, and every comment is welcome here.

Anonymous said...

The Alaska Division of Agriculture is the most expensive, least productive, marketing program in the country. Social media posts are a subpar marketing tool and they rarely promote farms. Hiring high school kids, or college interns to "check on the stores" is hardly a way to assure the AK Grown brand is accurately represented. I have been in a store when a kid, that was probably high school aged, just handed them some stickers, asked a couple scripted questions, then left.

Ask yourself, in times of budget deficits, what exactly is the marketing program doing? Why is there so much money going to staff? What do they have to show for it and why can't we see it?

The DOA's website don't reflect from 2017 aside from some poorly done newsletters. If anything, the Alaska Farmland Trust is doing all of the marketing, for those in the Palmer/Wasilla region. Us in Delta get nada, nothing, zip. I believe their Executive Director is the old Marketing Director for the DOA, am I correct?

As far as a solution? I am not paid 6 figures a year to help the directors with doing their jobs. But If the state implements an income tax on us, then yes, it is my business to question what they are doing.

suvalley said...

People forget, that we are already taxed at 75%. That is the royalty share that the state collects "on our behalf", for state government. In other words....we do pay for those six figure salaries, and it most certainly IS our business to question what they are doing.

If the state didn't have that royalty income, we certainly wouldn't have six figure salaries for a piddly little department that "is the most expensive, least productive, marketing program in the country" lol

They serve US, they work for US, they are accountable to us, to each and every resident.



Anderson.john118 said...

Sounds a lot like Jennifer and if not, definitely someone working for the DOA. I will bite on your comment. First off I would like to thank you first and foremost for acknowledging that there is misuse and false labeling. My suggestion is to stick with what's already in place and investigate actual complaints. I know in the past the marketing manager for the DOA told me they have in the past had complaints of a certain Kenny Lake area pig importer selling under Alaska Grown yet when I looked into this they had no documents surprisingly enough. In fact they only have formally followed up on apparel complaints not livestock or produce. We need to follow what's in place and if you want you can start an Alaskan finished or Alaskan killed label. I think that would be fair.

Btw in the Alaska grown application it says that our farms can be inspected at any time.

Anonymous said...

Odd how Arthur Keys can not do anything without Amy Pettit right there! One would think that being hired as Director he could at least whip his own Ass but obviously not without Amy Pettit helping she's got her Big Head and Long Nose in Everything! She did a crap job at marketing Alaska Grown as well as run up the expense tab trying to be a big shot while she was here you would think she would keep here nose out of day to day business and concentrate on Alaska Farm Land try to screw people Trust! Well at least Arthur Keys has a go to person for when he's in over his head and she can loan him her Pink Pussy Hat!

Todd Pettit said...

Mr. Anonymous, you are a vile, disrespectful, coward. You feel it necessary to hide behind your keyboard, and spew your misogynistic comments about another that is not only offensive but derogatory towards a women, and any man with decency and morality would feel the same as I. You went to far buddy.
Why don't you man the fuck up and tell me who you are, so I may personally knock some manners and respect into that mouth of yours. If you people that comment and read this type of trash can stand by and not speak up and out against these types of remarks you are no better then the little,little man that wrote this shit. These types of comments are why your blog, lacks all credibility. Tiana.
Todd Pettit

Anonymous said...

Or maybe just maybe the reason why people are not speaking up is the credibility you say is lacking is just exactly what the truth is! Lone Ranger

suvalley said...

Misogyny because it had to be a man who posted? How do you know, Todd? You do not. You assume, that's all.

And since when is anyone responsible for another persons' comments? Only in your world, Todd, does an anonymous comment equate credibility.

Funny, you never address the content, just the author. A woman.

Got a problem with women, Todd?

Misogynous, much?

Anonymous said...

I have noticed that your blog must be watched by someone, as both Mike's Meats and Butcher Block #9 and Mat Valley Meats have changed there Alaska Grown Beef advertising a tad bit/Whole heck of a lot! Thank YOU! For bringing attention to THIS. Kudos to you Mrs. Blog Writer

Anonymous said...

If what I am hearing about the Freedom of Information Act Request are true wonder how Arthur Keys is going to handle having to deal with his buddies in a criminal manner! Anybody have any info on this?